Legal Opinion

People v. Gutierrez

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 2, 2018No. A153419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTucher, J.

The issue in this case is one that arises every day in California. A law enforcement officer arresting someone for driving under the influence (DUI) informs the suspect that he or she must submit to a breath test or blood test to measure blood alcohol content (BAC). If the suspect, *731faced with this choice between tests, elects a blood test, must the arresting officer then get a warrant before having the suspect's blood drawn? We conclude no warrant is necessary in these circumstances, under the well-recognized and categorical exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement for a search…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. NzolamesoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. People v. NzolamesoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API