People v. Gutierrez
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtTucher, J.
The issue in this case is one that arises every day in California. A law enforcement officer arresting someone for driving under the influence (DUI) informs the suspect that he or she must submit to a breath test or blood test to measure blood alcohol content (BAC). If the suspect, *731faced with this choice between tests, elects a blood test, must the arresting officer then get a warrant before having the suspect's blood drawn? We conclude no warrant is necessary in these circumstances, under the well-recognized and categorical exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement for a search…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. NzolamesoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. NzolamesoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019