Legal Opinion

United States v. Gudmundson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided December 19, 2002No. 02-0264/AFPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, 1 of wrongful use of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2002). The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence in an unpublished opinion.

This Court granted review of the following issue:

WHETHER THE CONVENING…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. KhoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. JeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  3. United States v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API