Legal Opinion

Mills v. Paul

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1892No. Motion No. 17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from El Pasp. Motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

The appellees in this case have filed a mo-

tion seeking to strike from the files and have this court refuse to consider the transcript filed by the appellants, upon the grounds:

1. That the record shows four separate and distinct judgments of four separate and distinct cases.

2. Because the caption does not refer to or name either one of the causes, the record of which is presented and transcript filed.

3. Because the certificate of the clerk only refers to three of the causes tried, and does not embrace the principal case disclosed by the record.

4. Because the clerk’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Mignon v. BrinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Simpson v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wright v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Atlantic Fruit DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Hamilton v. JoachimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Texas Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. McCarty v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API