Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Joachim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This was a suit by S. Jo-achim, for himself, and as temporary administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, in which his five minor children, the heirs of the wife, were also joined as parties plaintiff, against H. Hamilton, H. Prince, and A. E. Stimson, as defendants.

The pleadings are very voluminous, and for the purposes of this opinion it is sufficient to say the petition alleged that Stimson leased certain premises in the Sour Lake oil field, in Hardin county, Tex., to S. Jo-achim for the development of oil by contract dated May 15, 1903, by the terms of which Joachim was to pay to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Texas Land & Loan Co. v. WinterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Burnett v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arrington v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pitt v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Moore v. Toyah Valley Irr. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Cannon v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API