Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Holman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1940No. 4 Div. 147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question presented on this appeal is whether there is error in sustaining demurrer to the cross-bill and dismissing it. It was filed by a respondent against a corespondent in a bill filed by the heirs of a deceased mortgagor to set aside a foreclosure of a mortgage to said co-respondent, Holman, who afterwards sold and conveyed the land by warranty deed to the cross-complainant, Hawkins; wherein it was sought to charge both of them with the value of the use and occupation of the land, or for rents collected, on an accounting incident to an exercise of the equity of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Thomas v. St Paul's M. E. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Tillis v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Segall v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maya Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Ex Parte R. A. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Denson v. HowzeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Mitchell v. ConwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Murphy v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API