Legal Opinion

Maya Corporation v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 5, 1940No. 8 Div. 6PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The pleadings as originally filed are substantially set out on a former appeal. 227 Ala. 6, 148 So. 621. The facts there stated need not be repeated. Amendments have been filed since that appeal was disposed of. As amended, the bill alleges that there was a modification of the contract of January 1, 1926, effected at a later date (shown to have been March 24, 1926), and complainant consented in the amendment that the rights of the parties may be settled and adjusted in the light of such changes, but does not set out his version of such changes.

It also alleges that the Cherokee…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Randle v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Heirs v. United States Bank of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Ingalls v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Pennington v. Birmingham Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Humphrey v. LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API