Bradley v. Williams
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMEORD,' J.
The complaint was in two counts, claiming damages from the defendant on account of injury sustained while plaintiff was attempting to board one of defendant’s Street cars. The pleas were the general issue arid contributory negligence. The evidence was conflicting; that for the plaintiff tending to prove; the plaintiff’s casej and that for defendant tending to prove contributory negligence.
At the conclusion of the evidence and after the court, had orally charged the Jury, both on the law of negligence and contributory negligence, the defendant requested in writing the giving of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stoudenmeier v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Bales v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Barfield v. South Highlands InfirmarySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- North Birmingham Railway Co. v. LiddicoatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Merkle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Hess v. Cincinnati Street Railway Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1931