Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Roebuck
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Plaintiff was injured when she boarded or attempted to board defendant’s bus at a regular bus stop near a street intersection in Oklahoma City.
The trial court so framed his instructions to the jury as to constitute an assumption that the plaintiff was a passenger, and the jury was instructed that the defendant owed the plaintiff a high degree of care as a passenger. That is assigned as error and is relied upon for reversal.
Defendant points out that “the fact as to whether plaintiff was a passenger was in controversy,” and by the instruction complained of “the court assumed this controversy as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smith v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Schepers v. Union Depot RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Devoy v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Clark v. . Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greater Richmond Transit Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991