Van Gundy v. Ellis
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ROY L. STEPHENSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is now before the Court upon the mo’’ions of the defendants, W. M. Tynan and Company, New York Central Railroad Company, and Morris E. Ellis, to dismiss this action or, in the alternative, to quash the return of service of summons. Resistances have been filed to each of the motions. The motions shall be considered separately.
There have been two services of process upon the defendant, W. M. Ty-nan and Company. Since the services of process were made outside the state of Iowa and were not made under any special federal provision, the validity of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chas. D. Long and Samuel H. Liberman, Trustees, and Paul E. Hord and Jane S. Hord v. Victor Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Fernekes & Bros. v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Burkhardt v. BatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- James W. Heeney v. Marjorie E. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Matney v. CurrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Parks v. SlaughterDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967
- Krout v. BridgesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1973