Legal Opinion

Van Gundy v. Ellis

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided November 1, 1965No. Civ. No. 6-1718-C-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROY L. STEPHENSON, Chief Judge.

This matter is now before the Court upon the mo’’ions of the defendants, W. M. Tynan and Company, New York Central Railroad Company, and Morris E. Ellis, to dismiss this action or, in the alternative, to quash the return of service of summons. Resistances have been filed to each of the motions. The motions shall be considered separately.

There have been two services of process upon the defendant, W. M. Ty-nan and Company. Since the services of process were made outside the state of Iowa and were not made under any special federal provision, the validity of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chas. D. Long and Samuel H. Liberman, Trustees, and Paul E. Hord and Jane S. Hord v. Victor Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Fernekes & Bros. v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Burkhardt v. BatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James W. Heeney v. Marjorie E. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  3. Matney v. CurrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  4. Parks v. SlaughterDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Krout v. BridgesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API