Legal Opinion

In Re the Civil Commitment of Raboin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 2005No. A05-615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s order authorizing involuntary administration of neuroleptic medication and the court’s amended order denying appellant and his mother’s request to appoint appellant’s mother as his substitute decision-maker. Appellant argues that (1) the order authorizing the administration of neu-roleptic medication lacks the specificity required by law, and (2) the district court erred by concluding that it could not appoint appellant’s mother as his substitute decision-maker because she was not designated by the local mental-health authority.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Price v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Jarvis v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. R.K.LColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People ex rel. R.K.L.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API