Legal Opinion

Town of Clarksville, Indiana v. Chris Conte and Mary Ann Conte

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2013No. 10A05-1202-CT-105Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 11 2013, 10:06 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: REBECCA L. LOCKARD STEPHEN W. VOELKER Jeffersonville, Indiana Voelker Law Office Jeffersonville, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA ) ) Appellant-Defendant, ) ) vs. ) No. 10A05-1202-CT-105 ) CHRIS CONTE and MARY ANN CONTE, ) ) Appellees-Plaintiffs. )…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Williams v. Cingular WirelessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. McCauley v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Willett v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Town of Rome City v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API