Legal Opinion

Town of Rome City v. King

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1983No. 3-882A224PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.

Appellees Mr. and Mrs. King own two lots located on a peninsula extending northeasterly into Sylvan Lake. Lot 14 used for appellees' residence is located at the foot of the peninsula while Lot 15 of appellees is located at the neck. A road appearing on the plats of public record extends down the neck of the peninsula along the western edge of Lot 15 to appellees' residence. Appellant Rome City constructed a sewage pumping station, placing part of it in the area platted for the road and part on Lots 14 and 15. The operation of the facility has resulted in noise and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Elder v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. PenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re the Marriage of MoserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API