Legal Opinion

United States v. Zammit

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 3, 1983No. 44205; NMCM 81-2447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COOK, Judge:

Appellee was convicted by a special court-martial, military judge alone, pursuant to mixed pleas, of five specifications of unauthorized absence and sixteen specifications of failing to report to restricted men’s muster, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 45 days, forfeiture of $275 pay per month for 3 months, and reduction to E-l. The convening and supervisory authorities approved the sentence. The Court of Military Review approved the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. PapenheimUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. ZammitU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. BrightU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. DunlapUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. Van SteenwykU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. BankstonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. MarescaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API