In Re: Michael C. Washington
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner Michael C. Washington has filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. He also seeks leave of this court to proceed with his petition without the prepayment of fees, and has submitted the necessary forms and declarations. Because we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prevents petitioner from proceeding in forma pauperis in this proceeding, we deny petitioner leave to proceed without prepayment of fees.
“Section 1915(g) generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis in civil actions if three or more of his prior suits have been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Washington v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dubuc v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Norman CrittendenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- COLE v. DIXONDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2024
- Daker v. HeadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- Dubuc v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.