Legal Opinion

In Re: Michael C. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1997No. 97-731PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner Michael C. Washington has filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. He also seeks leave of this court to proceed with his petition without the prepayment of fees, and has submitted the necessary forms and declarations. Because we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prevents petitioner from proceeding in forma pauperis in this proceeding, we deny petitioner leave to proceed without prepayment of fees.

“Section 1915(g) generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding in forma pauperis in civil actions if three or more of his prior suits have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Washington v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dubuc v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re Norman CrittendenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. COLE v. DIXONDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2024
  4. Daker v. HeadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
  5. Dubuc v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API