Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Britt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1991No. 58750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

Defendants Michael and Peggy Britt appeal from the trial court’s order which denied their Rule 74.05 motion to set aside default judgment. We find defendants’ motion failed to set forth sufficient facts to establish a meritorious defense. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion. We affirm.1

I. Background

Defendants are the owners of a building at 759 Lemay Ferry Road. Part of that building is occupied by an insurance company which employed plaintiff.

Plaintiff alleged that on October 12, 1987, “as [she] was leaving the premises, she descended…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Robson v. WillersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bredeman v. EnoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Great American Acceptance Corp. v. ZwegoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Ben F. Blanton Construction, Inc. v. Castle Hill Holdings XI, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API