Legal Opinion

Frank v. Herold

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 20, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On application for a rehearing of an appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney.

1Per curiam

The appellants were adjudged guilty-'of a contempt, and were fined and sentenced to imprisonment íor a period of sixty days, by the court of chancery, for willfully violating a restraining order of that court. The appeal was dismissed, upon the ground that the proceedings were punitive in their character, taken solely for the purpose of vindicating the authority and dignity of the court, and were, consequently, not reviewable.

A rehearing of the matter is now asked for, because, as it is said, the court of chancery was without power to make the order appealed from, so far as it sentences the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zippertubing Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re Ruth M. BuehrerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Passaic-Athenia Bus Co. v. Consolidated, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Department of Health v. RoselleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  5. Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API