Legal Opinion
Department of Health v. Roselle
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 20, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
34 N.J. 331 (1961)
169 A.2d 153
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PETER ROSELLE, ET AL., ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 9, 1961.
Decided March 20, 1961.
Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys; Mr. Samuel A. Larner, of counsel).
Mr. William L. Boyan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Messrs. William L. Boyan and William D. Hill, of counsel).
The opinion of the court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- In Re William Brown, Jr.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- In Re ReevesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972