Legal Opinion
Rose v. Denman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1997No. 75A03-9510-CV-327PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellants-defendants James E. Rose, Lake Holiday Enterprises, Inc., and Lake Holiday Enterprises, an Indiana partnership, appeal the trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part appellees-plaintiffs Frank Denman, Beverly Denman, Lewis Pleasant, Darice Pleasant, John Hofferth, Janice Hofferth, Arthur Hoviek, Eileen Hov-ick, Lee Roy Wells and Dorothy Wells' motion for class certification.
On January 27, 1992, the plaintiffs filed their 17-count amended complaint against the defendants, who owned and operated Lake Holiday Recreational Vehicle Park (“R.V.Park”).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowen v. SonnenburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- American Cyanamid Co. v. StephenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- ConAgra, Inc. v. FarringtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Showalter, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Edward D. Jones & Co. v. ColeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. BolkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- MCS LaserTec, Inc. v. KaminskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Indiana Business College v. HollowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Johnson v. Johnson County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cavinder Elevators, Inc. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.