State Ins. v. Jordan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to tlie district court for Madison county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited: State Ins. Co. v. Jordan, 24 Neb., 358; Bobbitt v. Ins. Co., 66 N. C., 70 [8 Am. Rep., 494]; Patrick v. Ins. Co., 43 N. H., 621 [80 Am. Dec., 197]; Sansum’s Ins. Dig., 491, secs. 28, 29; 1126, sec. 107; 1130, see. 14; 1110, see. 35; 666, secs. 2, 3; 668, sec. 13; 669, sec. 18; Eastern E. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co., 98 Mass., 420; 2 Wood, F. Ins., sec. 436; 440, N. 3; Spring Oarden M. Ins.
Read the full summary
Error to tlie district court for Madison county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited: State Ins. Co. v. Jordan, 24 Neb., 358; Bobbitt v. Ins. Co., 66 N. C., 70 [8 Am. Rep., 494]; Patrick v. Ins. Co., 43 N. H., 621 [80 Am. Dec., 197]; Sansum’s Ins. Dig., 491, secs. 28, 29; 1126, sec. 107; 1130, see. 14; 1110, see. 35; 666, secs. 2, 3; 668, sec. 13; 669, sec. 18; Eastern E. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co., 98 Mass., 420; 2 Wood, F. Ins., sec. 436; 440, N. 3; Spring Oarden M. Ins. Co. v. Evans, 9 Md. 1 [66 Am. Dec., 308]; Smith v. Ins. Co., 1 Allen [Mass.], 297 [79 Am. Dec., 733]; Shoemaker v. Ins. Co., 60…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action on a policy of insurance. The insurance company in its amended answer to the amended petition alleges:
“ That at the time said policy of insurance was issued the plaintiff made his written application therefor, in which he warranted said application to contain a true and full descrip*516tion and statement of the condition, situation, value, occupancy, and title of the property proposed to be insured in the said State Insurance Company of Des Moines, and warranted the answers to each of the questions asked in said application to be true; that among the questions asked in said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Manhattan Fire Ins. v. Weill & UllmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Ring v. Windsor County Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
- Mullin v. Vt. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
3Cited by15 opinions
- Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Home Fire Insurance v. FallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Ericksen v. PearsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Home Fire Insurance v. Hammang Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Summers v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.