Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Nichols

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 30, 2001No. 2 CA-SA 01-0062PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLÓREZ, J.

¶ 1 Real party in interest Jack Motley was charged by indictment with possessing a dangerous drug for sale and possessing marijuana for sale. 1 Petitioner State of Arizona filed an allegation of serious drug offense (significant source of income) pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-3410(A), which provides, in relevant part, that a person convicted of one or both of these substantive offenses who receives more than $25,000 income in a calendar year through a pattern of illegal drug sales shall be sentenced to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole for twenty-five years. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. Fabian Aguayo-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SiersWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. People v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. State v. BenenatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API