Legal Opinion

J. D. Construction Corp. v. Isaacs

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant moved to strike one count of an amended complaint, before answer filed, as failing upon its face to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, R. R. 4:12-2(e). The Law Division granted the motion as to certain allegations thereof and ordered plaintiffs to file and serve a further amended complaint deleting the stricken portions. The Appellate Division affirmed on plaintiffs’ appeal from this interlocutory order, allowed by leave of the court. 95 N. J. Super. 122 (1967). We granted plaintiffs’ petition for certification. 50 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Fenning v. SG Holding Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. JD Const. Corp. v. IsaacsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Peacock v. Burlington County Historical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  5. Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burke v. DeinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Fees v. TrowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Supry v. BolducSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Gersh v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API