Legal Opinion
In Re Succession of Bankston
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 2003No. 2002 CA 0548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
844 So.2d 61 (2003)
SUCCESSION OF Betty Kinchen BANKSTON.
No. 2002 CA 0548.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
February 14, 2003.
Writ Denied May 9, 2003.
Deborah M. Henson, New Orleans, Laurie Rolling Hagan, Metairie, Counsel for Appellant Jeannette Rose Kinchen Perry.
Joseph H. Simpson, Amite, In Proper Person and Attorney for William Paul Simpson, Appellees.
Before: FOIL, McCLENDON and KLINE[1], JJ.
McCLENDON, J.
The issues raised on appeal in this succession case are whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on the issue of the reasonableness of a contingency fee contract…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- STATE, DOTD v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Central Progressive Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- J. Ray McDermott, Inc. v. MorrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Succession of CloudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mapp Construction, LLC v. Amerisure Mutal Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sanders v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Regions Bank v. AUTOMAX USA, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Gillio v. Hanover American Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.