Legal Opinion

Ajomale v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided March 19, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00539Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UZEZI AJOMALE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-539-JB-MU ) QUICKEN LOANS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Quicken Loans, Inc.’s (“Quicken”) Motion for Summary Judgment and supporting memorandum of law (Docs. 77 and 78), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 84), and Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 88). The Motion is ripe for review. After careful consideration, the Court finds Defendant’s Motion is due to be GRANTED on the grounds and for the reasons…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API