Stagg P.C. v. U.S. Dep't of State
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:
*453This litigation was prompted by a proposed, but never enacted, regulatory amendment; even today, years into the litigation, the parties' disputes occasionally tilt toward the speculative or the hoped-for, rather than the actual. At base, the suit concerns First and Fifth Amendment facial challenges to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (the "ITAR"), 22 C.F.R. parts 120-130, which is the regulatory regime that implements the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 (the "AECA"), 22 U.S.C. ch. 39. Among other things, the ITAR imposes strict licensing…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- American Patriot Express v. The City of Glens Falls, New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020