Wright v. Armwood
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
In 1948 Grant Wright and Henry Arm-wood formed a partnership to conduct a frozen custard business in Richmond, Virginia, .Armwood, who alone managed the business, closed it about a year later. Thereafter Wright was compelled to pay a creditor of the partnership the full amount due on a joint promissory note which the partners had given for equipment. He brought this action to require contribution by Armwood. The trial court ruled that the suit could not be maintained because no accounting or settlement of the partnership accounts had ever been reached between the parties.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riddle v. WhitehillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Klepinger v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Rowe v. Nolan Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Bair v. BryantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Summerson v. DonovanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Warren v. ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Barthuly v. BarthulyNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990