Legal Opinion

Boedeker v. Rogers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2000No. 74929PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karpinski, Judge.

This is an appeal by Harold T. Duryee, Superintendent of Insurance of the Ohio Department of Insurance, in his capacity as the liquidator of the P.I.E. Mutual Insurance Company. Duryee asks us to hold that the same Ohio law that explicitly authorizes the Superintendent of Insurance to assume responsibility over a liquidated insurer’s affairs under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 3908 implicitly authorizes the Superintendent to be substituted as the plaintiff in this action in which shareholders of the insurer pleaded derivative claims on behalf of the corporation as well as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Dallman v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Adair v. WozniakOhio Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Lowe v. Bowers (In Re Nicole Gas Prod., Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Carlson v. RabkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API