Legal Opinion
In re the Rehabilitation of Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 1936No. Plan No. 1892 — B & M 1451PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
On May 11, 1936, the Legislature amended chapter 19 of the Laws of 1935, known as the Mortgage Commission Act, by adding a new section, which reads:
“ § 27-a. Exemption from filing fees. The Commission, or any subsidiary corporation or corporations owned and controlled by it, shall not be required to pay any fee to any public officer in connection with any action or proceeding to which the Commission or any of its subsidiaries is a party or for filing, recording, or in any manner authenticating any paper or instrument relating to any such action or proceeding.” (Laws of 1936, chap. 514.)
Subsequ…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbus & Greenville R. Co. v. Miller Ex Rel. Mississippi Levee Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- In re LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- In re the Rehabilitation of Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- 241 East 22nd Street Corp. v. City Rent AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of Buffalo v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Posner v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Andrews v. Empire City Racing Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.