Legal Opinion
Rimpa v. Bell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 21, 1964No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice O’Brien,
The instant appeal is from a judgment on the pleadings, entered for the additional defendants and against the original defendant. The facts are well summarized in the opinion of the court below as follows: “On February 13, 1962, an action in trespass was instituted by the filing of a complaint by Carl Rimpa against Helen Bell, formerly Helen Motter, Administratrix of the Es tate of Lawrence R. Motter, Deceased. The action was brought for the recovery of damages to a truck tractor owned by the Plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of the decedent,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kilian v. Allegheny County DistributorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Killian v. CataneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Greet v. Arned Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Teodori v. Penn Hills School District AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Moyer v. Independent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Erie Drug Co. CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. YudacufskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Steffy v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Mahoney v. McDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.