Legal Opinion
Matter of Curtin v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1942PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The claimant’s husband died on February 2, 1938, as the result of accidental injuries which he had sustained on that day and which arose out of and in the course of his employment. Pursuant to the provisions of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) the claimant served a notice, dated March 21, 1938, that an action had been commenced against a third party and that the claimant makes “ claim for all benefits due me under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.” An award of compensation to the widow at the weekly rate of $10.39 was filed in the office of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Solomone v. Degnon Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Claim of Mohr v. Wiebusch & Hilger, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Claim of Kabel v. Lane Engineering Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Matter of Mundt v. Spencer SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Becker v. Huss Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Knight-Ridder Broadcasting, Inc. v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kelly v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Castleberry v. Hudson Valley Asphalt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- VISITATION OF CATHY LM v. Mark Brent R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.