Peoples v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is robbery with a prior robbery conviction alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not questioned. Appellant’s first ground of error is that the court erred in not granting him more than three days in order to secure an attorney of his choice. Some three months before the filing of this pro se motion the court had appointed an attorney who did actually represent appellant at his trial. Appellant admits that his court-appointed attorney represented him adequately. No abuse of discretion is shown, Estrada v. State,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Trammell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Duke v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.