Legal Opinion
Dahlberg v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1990No. 90-5015MNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Gloria and Vince Dahlberg appeal from the district court’s order granting appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment because the applicable statute of limitations bars the Dahlbergs’ medical malpractice action. The Dahlbergs contend that the district court erred in holding that the Wisconsin borrowing statute, Wis.Stat. § 893.07 (1987-88), requires the forum court to adopt the commencement provision of the jurisdiction whose statute of limitations applies. Because we believe the opinion the district court relied upon is not binding and that the Wisconsin Supreme Court would…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Kosulandich v. Survival Technology, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
- Princess House, Inc. v. LindseyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
- Bell v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Dahlberg v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.