Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1923No. 10415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

Mrs. Nannie Burch conveyed to E. K. Longan two lots in the town of Newcastle, in part consideration for which Longan executed his two notes secured by a vendor’s lien on the property, each for the principal sum of $1,000. The notes were dated August 5, 1919; one matured January 1, 1920, and the other January 1, 1921.

Longan sold the two lots to R. F. Arnold, Jr., who assumed payment of the notes, and as a' further consideration for the sale he executed to Logan his note for $500, dated January 20, 1920, which recited that it was secured by a vendor’s lien on the lots, but that the lien was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oury v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Sullivan v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bell v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Askey v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ramey v. CageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. American General Ins. Co. v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Walworth County State Bank v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kostas v. C. D. Shamburger Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API