Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chemical Bank

Orangetown Justice Court

Decided March 20, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul B. Phinney, III, J.

Petitioners have brought on a summary proceeding alleging that the respondent tenants have failed to pay the rent as required in the lease in the sum of $2,333.33 and seek recovery of unpaid rent plus legal fees in the sum of $600 plus costs and disbursements. The respondent has appeared and denied the allegations and has set up an affirmative defense that the rent has been incorrectly calculated and, in fact, is a lower amount which Chemical Bank has forwarded to petitioner and which petitioner has rejected. Chemical Bank is also counterclaiming…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Penn Central Corp. & Consolidated Rail Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Arbitration between Dimson & ElghanayanNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. European-American Banking Corp. v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Tamaron Investment, Inc. & RaiaNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API