Rachal Laut, f/k/a Rachal Govro, and John M. Soellner v. City of Arnold
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtLaura Denvir Stith, Judge
Plaintiffs Rachal Laut and John Soellner appeal the trial court’s judgment that Plaintiffs are not entitled to a civil penalty or attorney’s fees under section 610.0271 for Defendant City of Arnold’s (the city) failure to provide an internal affairs report in response to Plaintiffs’ Sunshine Law request because the failure to disclose the report did not result from a knowing or purposeful violation of the Sunshine Law. This Court affirms.
What constitutes a knowing or purposeful violation of the Sunshine Law is a question of law. Section 610.027 expressly states that a knowing violation occurs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Richard E. Ivie, Jimmie R. Ivie, LaDonna Small, and Bernard Ivie v. Arnold L. Smith and Sidney B. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Treasurer of the State v. WitteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Guyer v. City of KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- R.M.A. (a Minor Child), by his Next Friend: Rachelle Appleberry v. Blue Springs R-IV School District and Blue Springs School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- Holm v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- State ex rel. Tivol Plaza, Inc. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- Penzel Constr. Co. v. Jackson R-2 Sch. Dist., Warner-Nease-Bost Architects & Henthorn, Sandmeyer & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State of Missouri v. Wesley William OsbornMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.