Legal Opinion

Inline Connection Corp. v. AOL Time Warner Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 5, 2007No. C.A. 02-272-MPT, C.A. 02-477-MPTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a patent infringement case. Inline Communication Corporation 1 (“Inline”) sued America Online Inc. (“AOL”) on April 12, 2002, and EarthLink, Inc. (“EarthLink”) on June 4, 2002, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,844,596 (“the ’596 patent”), 6,243,446 (“the ’446 patent”), and 6,236,718 (“the ’718 patent”). 2

AOL and EarthLink (defendants) filed a motion 3 requesting the court preclude Inline’s infringement expert, Charles L. Jackson, from offering certain testimony at trial. Defendants’ motion is directed at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Withrow v. SpearsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. ClementMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Arason Enterprises, Inc. v. CabinetBed Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
  4. Bettie Smith v. Charles ClementMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bettie Smith v. Charles ClementMississippi Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API