In the Interest of D. M.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
A juvenile court adjudicated D. M., age 15, delinquent for acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted aggravated assault (OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (1)). D. M. appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support his adjudication of aggravated assault and that his trial counsel was ineffective. Finding that the evidence was insufficient to support D. M.’s adjudication of aggravated assault but sufficient to support an adjudication of the lesser included offense of simple battery, we vacate the judgment and remand.
In considering a challenge to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Dickens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- In the Interest of M. C. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Interest of S. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- In Re DmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest Of: S.W. , a ChildCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016