In the Interest of M. C. A.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
M. C. A. was adjudicated a delinquent for committing the offenses of entering an automobile with the intent to commit a theft therein, OCGA § 16-8-18, and theft by taking, OCGA § 16-8-2. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting an adjudication of delinquency, we construe the evidence and every inference from the evidence in favor of the juvenile court’s adjudication to determine if a reasonable finder of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the juvenile committed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sorrells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- In the Interest J. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest of J. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of K. B. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of S. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of C. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.