Legal Opinion

Hacker v. Perez

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1971No. 38014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an action to recover damages as the result of a collision at an unprotected intersection of two graveled county roads 6 miles north and 3 miles east of Scottsbluff, Nebraska. Plaintiff, Doyle L. Hacker, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendant, Ramiro A. Perez. We affirm.

Plaintiff sets out seven assignments of error. However, only one is argued in his brief: The trial court should have directed a verdict for the plaintiff. If the trial court had done so, it would have constituted reversible error.

In determining whether a party is entitled to a directed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Costanzo v. TRUSTIN MANUFACTURING CORP.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Thompsen v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Napier v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huntwork v. VossNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Treffer v. SeeversNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Pearson v. RichardNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smith v. KellermanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Simet v. SageNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API