Hacker v. Perez
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This is an action to recover damages as the result of a collision at an unprotected intersection of two graveled county roads 6 miles north and 3 miles east of Scottsbluff, Nebraska. Plaintiff, Doyle L. Hacker, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendant, Ramiro A. Perez. We affirm.
Plaintiff sets out seven assignments of error. However, only one is argued in his brief: The trial court should have directed a verdict for the plaintiff. If the trial court had done so, it would have constituted reversible error.
In determining whether a party is entitled to a directed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Costanzo v. TRUSTIN MANUFACTURING CORP.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Thompsen v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Napier v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by9 opinions
- Huntwork v. VossNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Treffer v. SeeversNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Pearson v. RichardNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Smith v. KellermanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
- Simet v. SageNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.