Legal Opinion

Thompsen v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1964No. 35695PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile accident brought by Carl Thompsen as plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, Janice Miller. The plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled and he has appealed.

The plaintiff’s assignments of error are that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and the law; that the trial court should have instructed the jury that the defendant was negligent as a matter of law; and that the trial court erred in striking the plaintiff’s testimony concerning damages for loss of use of his automobile.

In determining the sufficiency…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perrine v. HokserNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Costanzo v. TRUSTIN MANUFACTURING CORP.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schwartz v. HibdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Robinson v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. ENTERPRISE COMPANY v. Sanitary District No. OneNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daniels Ex Rel. Jones v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kehm v. DumpertNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hacker v. PerezNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lucht v. American Propane Gas Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Drahota v. WieserNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API