Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ansari Mohamad v. Lawgical Insight, LLC, Andrew Bauta, Michael Russo, Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP, Meliza Miller, and Richard I. Segal

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 21, 2026No. 6:24-cv-02354Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ANSARI MOHAMAD, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:24-cv-2354-JSS-LHP LAWGICAL INSIGHT, LLC, ANDREW BAUTA, MICHAEL RUSSO, ROTTENSTREICH FARLEY BRONSTEIN FISHER POTTER HODAS LLP, MELIZA MILLER, and RICHARD I. SEGAL, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

509 U.S. 579

(1993), Defendants Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP, Meliza Miller, and Richard I. Segal (the Lawyer Defendants) move to exclude opinions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. McLean v. 988011 Ontario, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Rink v. Cheminova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Johnny C. McClain v. Metabolife International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API