Legal Opinion

Olbert v. Ede

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

A finding of fact by the trial court will not be set aside unless it is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Mitchell v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 419, 141 N. W. 2d 212; Sid Grinker Co. v. Craighead (1966), 33 Wis. 2d 42, 146 N. W. 2d 478. The crucial finding in the instant case is that the original plans and specifications were abandoned to the extent that it is impossible to trace the original contract in the work done.

The respondent in his brief enumerates 69 changes, many of which are of a substantial nature, that represent marked…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Mitchell v. WESTERN CASAULTY & SURETY CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sid Grinker Co. v. CraigheadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hammersberg v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barth Brothers v. BillingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Trinity Builders, Inc. v. SchaffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dunn v. Fred A. Mikkelson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. La Velle v. De LucaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Superior Builders, Inc. v. LargeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API