Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Town of Hampton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 7, 1985No. 84-385PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

In this case we are asked to answer two questions certified by the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire {Loughlin, J.) pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 34. These questions relate to whether New Hampshire law recognizes an exception to the general rule that a plaintiff may not maintain a tort action that seeks damages resulting from the suicide of another. We answer that the law in this State does recognize such an exception under certain circumstances.

The questions certified by the district court are:

“1. Does New Hampshire law recognize as valid the exception to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Briere v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  5. Tate v. CanonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kimberlin v. DeLongIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mikell v. SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT NO. 33Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Rowe v. MarderDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Clift v. Narragansett Television L.P.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Andrade v. Jamestown Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API