Legal Opinion

Barleycorn v. Woolley

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to compel the purchaser at a foreclosure sale to complete his purchase.

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

The plaintiff, the foreclosing mortgagee of realty, moves to compel the purchaser at the foreclosure sale to complete his purchase, and the purchaser contends that the title is not marketable and asks for the return of Ms payment on account and for reimbursement of Ms expenses. The claimed defect relates to the attempt to bring in as parties defendant the successors in interest, whoever they may be, of James Woolley, who died on February 6, 1918, in Brooklyn, New York city, intestate, seized of an undivided interest in the mortgaged premises. The plaintiff had obtained, in right season, an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shriver v. . ShriverNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Greenblatt v. . HermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . SidorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Ruff v. GerhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. Conklin v. Federal Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. College Point Savings Bank v. BonfiglioNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API