Stryker v. Tolliver & Kinney Mercantile Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
The defendant in error was plaintiff below and had judgment against the plaintiffs in error for breach of a bond in which Stryker was principal and the surety company was surety, given under C. L. 9514, to secure the payment by Stryker of bills for labor and material to be incurred by him in the performance of a contract between him and the city of Fort Collins. The defendants bring error and move for supersedeas.
The judgment was right. The statute is as follows: “That hereafter any person * * * entering into a contract with any city * * * shall be required * * * to execute * * * a penal bond…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- McPhee v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- South-Way Construction Co. v. Adams City ServiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930