United States v. Robert Nathan Alfaro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.
Robert Nathan Alfaro was sentenced for having illegally imported certain specified chemicals used in manufacturing a controlled substance. The district court applied a 14-level upward departure that was calculated using a sentencing guideline that did not govern Alfaro’s offense. Nor, at the time of the offense, did that guideline cover the chemical for which the departure was applied. Alfaro appeals the sentence, contending that the upward departure was unwarranted, was unreasonable in magnitude, and violated the ex post facto clause. He also submits that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Alfredo Lopez-Solis, AKA Alfredo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Dorothy MenyweatherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David Benitez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.