Legal Opinion

Thiel v. MKA Real Estate Qualified Fund CA1/4

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 2016No. A144099Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 10/3/16 Thiel v. MKA Real Estate Qualified Fund CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR PENELOPE GAE THIEL, as Successor in Interest to NORMAN M. THIEL, Plaintiff and Respondent, A144099, A144984 v.…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API