Legal Opinion

Vasquez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 23, 1986No. 85 Civ. 6354 (WCC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:

Plaintiff Angel Vasquez (“Vasquez” or “the claimant”) brought this action under sections 205(g) and 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3) (1982), seeking review of a final determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“the Secretary”) that plaintiff is not disabled as defined by the Act, and therefore is not entitled to disability insurance or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits.

Vasquez has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 12(c), Fed.R.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Walter E. Parker v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Frank Aubeuf v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gecevic v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Stupakevich v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  3. David L. Poole v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Santiago v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. Saviano v. ChaterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API