Legal Opinion
Wyatt v. Herring
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit.. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought by plaintiff in justice's court.
Plaintiff declared specially as follows:
“ For that whereas, heretofore, to wit, on or about September 15, 1889, the said defendant, John Herring, promised and agreed with the said plaintiff, John P. Wyatt, that if he, the said plaintiff, would sell or procure a sale of his (defendant's) mill property in the township of Allen, Hillsdale county, State of Michigan, consisting of a mill, store, and buildings connected therewith, he, the said defendant, would pay the sum of $400 for his services. Plaintiff further charges and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eaton v. LymanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Hickey v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Owen v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
- Wetmore v. McDougallMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by3 opinions
- Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Litvin v. JoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Vandenberg v. SlaghMichigan Supreme Court · 1907