Legal Opinion
Landers v. Felton
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky
Decided April 18, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
This is a motion to remand. Plaintiff «brings his action against S. M. Felton, receiver of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, appointed by the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky. The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company is a corporation' organized under the laws of Ohio, and a citizen thereof; the Southern Railway in Kentucky is a corporation organized under the laws of Kentucky; and Jerry Pannell is a citizen of Kentucky. The petition of the plaintiff, after alleging the citizenship of the corporate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
- Memphis & C. R. v. HoechnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gableman v. Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
- Lund v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1897
- Davenport v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
- Lewis v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1910
- Winters v. DrakeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.