Legal Opinion
Drs. MacHt, Podore & Associates, Inc. v. Girton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 7, 1975No. C-1-74-463PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending in this cause are two motions, the first being the motion of the plaintiff to remand the action to the state court in which it originated, and the second being the motion of the United States to quash the notice of garnishment. On this record, the facts are undisputed, and from these facts the following issues are presented for consideration.
1) Is a notice of garnishment a “civil action” removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq. ?
2) Is the United States Postal Service subject to garnishment proceedings?
The plaintiff, Drs. Macht, Podore & Associates, Inc.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StudeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. FreundtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Susie Randolph v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Stoll v. Hawkeye Casualty Co. Of Des Moines, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goodman's Furniture Company v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1976
- KCPO Employees Credit Union v. MitchellDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
- Milner v. BolgerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.